General faces trial in Afghanistan sex case

First Russell Williams, now Daniel Menard. These men were responsible for instilling a code of ethics into our Canadian soldiers who are currently representing Canada in Afghanistan.

-tj

This article appeared at: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/101123/national/afghan_cda_general_charged

Canadian Press

OTTAWA – The Canadian military says it will proceed with a court martial of one of its former mission commanders in Afghanistan over an alleged sexual affair with a subordinate while in the theatre of war.

 The Canadian Forces director of military prosecutions says he has reviewed the case and Brig.-Gen. Daniel Menard will face charges of inappropriate conduct.

 Investigators laid the charges in July and Menard’s subordinate, Master Cpl. Bianka Langlois, was convicted in a summary trial Sept. 28 of one count of conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline.

 She was reprimanded and fined $700.

 Menard, a 26-year army veteran, was Canada’s task force commander in Afghanistan at the time the affair allegedly took place. A married father of two, he was removed from his post in June and ordered home in disgrace.

 He will be tried on two counts of conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline and four counts of obstructing justice. Officials did not explain the latter charges. No date has been set for the trial.

 Military regulations bar soldiers, even married couples, from having intimate relations on deployment.

 “Following referral to the Canadian Forces director of military prosecutions, the charges facing Brig.-Gen. Menard were reviewed and subsequently brought forward or ‘preferred’ to Court Martial,” said a Defence Department release.

 “The Court Martial Administrator will convene the Court Martial at the first available date and at a location to be determined.”

 Under military law, Menard has a choice between facing trial by military judge alone — a standing court martial — or by a military judge and a five-member panel of officers — a general court martial.

 In the latter case, only the most senior of the five officers must outrank Menard.

 The maximum penalty for obstruction of justice is 10 years in prison, said Lt.-Col. Bruce MacGregor, director of military justice policy. For the conduct charges, the maximum penalty is dismissal with disgrace, which would all but rule out any chance Menard could re-enlist.

 The case came to light last spring after a court martial fined Menard $3,500 for negligently firing two rounds from his assault rifle.

 The decision to cashier Menard in a public fashion drew criticism and prompted a public debate about the Forces’ strict punishment for fraternization.

 Part of the criticism was based on the fact the Forces refused to immediately release the name of the woman accused of having a relationship with him.

-30-

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under afghanistan, Canadian Politics, Political Accountability

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s